Which statement best describes how to support an inference in a text?

• A. A direct quote without explanation.
• B. An assumption stated as fact.
• C. An inference should be supported with specific details from the text and reasoning explaining how they connect.
• D. A summary of the passage.

Answer: (C)

Inferring from a text works best when you tie your conclusion directly to specific details in the text and explain exactly how those details connect to what you’re inferring. The idea is to show that your inference isn’t a guess, but a conclusion supported by evidence and clear reasoning about how that evidence leads to it. For example, if a character avoids eye contact, shifts topics, and speaks in short answers, you would point to those details and explain how they suggest discomfort in the moment.

This approach is why the strongest choice emphasizes backing an inference with concrete textual details and a explanation of how those details support the conclusion. Quoting something without explaining how it supports your inference doesn’t show the link between evidence and conclusion. Stating an assumption as fact presents an idea as proven without textual support. Summarizing or restating content doesn’t require drawing new conclusions from the details. By focusing on exact evidence and the reasoning that connects it to your inference, you demonstrate a well-supported interpretation.